W promotes numerous attitudes toward
Meanwhile, numerous suggestions for actually influencing events in that direction have come up and withered for lack of attention from Washington – and not only in this administration, one has to confess.
The human right of keeping family connections? No, under W we’re going the other direction – banning Cuban Americans from visiting family in the mother country more often than every three years.
Your blogger spent many years abroad as a news correspondent watching as the Soviet empire decayed, and it was not advanced by banning family visits. The direction went the other way: encouraging family visits, more often the better, so that Western ideals and ways of life could be seen by those behind the Iron Curtain.
And the Iron Curtain is no more. In fact, its life, measured from the end of World War II until 1989 when the Berlin Wall opened, was 44 years. How long has Castro been able to stay in power? I don’t know whether it’s because of – or in spite of – the
2 comments:
Bush's Talk this week on Cuba was just more of the same old song that does not play well in Havana but it is a major hit in Miami among the reactionary Cuban Exile.
If this administration wants to promote democratic change in Cuba it needs to listen more carefully to moderate sectors of the Cuban exilies.
The tired old Cold war rhetoric of embargo and confrontation needs to be replaced by engagement and new directions.
Should we wonder whether the administration truly wants to "promote democratic change in Cuba," as jm wave postulates? Is it also possible that the administration prefers to have an enemy there in Havana? Someone to label terrorist?
Post a Comment